Probably no other
subject has been more
hotly debated in
American numismatics by
collectors, dealers and
investors than grading.
Since a dealer first
charged more for one
specimen of a coin than
for another of the same
type, date and Mint mark
simply because the
second had less wear or
more detail than the
other, there has been
controversy.
Read about, and view
examples of the various
coin grades
The grade of a coin
(note, medal or token)
represents what
professional numismatist
and researcher Dr.
Richard Bagg aptly
called its "level of
preservation." The
grading controversy
arises both from
disagreements over the
grade of a coin and the
enormous differences in
price that can arise
between two specimens of
the same type and date
of a U.S. coin, even
when the only difference
lies in the placement of
one or two marks or
surface abrasions from
contact with other
coins, commonly referred
to as "contact marks" or
"bag marks."
The grade measures the
amount of wear, natural
mishaps and other
surface degradation a
coin has received after
leaving the coining
press. The more wear and
surface marks a coin has
received, the less it is
worth compared to other
specimens of the same
coin with less surface
degradation.
However, not all coins
have received
circulation wear since
they were struck. These
coins are called
Uncirculated or Mint
State. Rather than being
easier to grade because
there are no points of
wear to determine,
Uncirculated coins
become much harder to
grade.
A
non-collector unexposed
to the intricacies of
grading might be
expected to show
surprise at this last
statement. After all, he
might think, it seems
logical that a coin that
has received less wear
is worth more than one
that has received more
wear. However, if a coin
hasn't received any
wear, how can it be
different from other
unworn specimens of the
same coin? Suffice to
say, there are graduated
levels of Mint State, at
least 11 (from Mint
State 60 to Mint State
70), determined by such
factors as contact
marks, luster and —
depending on the grading
standard being used —
the strength of the
strike and toning.
Therein lies the heart
of the controversy.
For decades, the
controversy lay mainly
in the differences
between the dealers
grade for a specific
coin and that of the
collector. However, as
the number of Mint State
grades began to
increase, grading became
more complicated and
values increased in
greater increments
between coins of
different grades. In
response, third-party
grading services began
operation.
The first third-party
grading service, the
International Numismatic
Society Authentication
Bureau, began grading
coins in December 1976,
several months after it
began authenticating
coins. It laid the
groundwork for
third-party grading
services, all of which
provide an opinion about
a coins grade for a fee.
INSAB was followed March
1, 1979, when the
American Numismatic
Association
Certification Service
began grading coins for
a fee.
Another major step in
third-party grading
services was taken by
the Professional Coin
Grading Service, a
private business founded
in February 1986. PCGS
is responsible for two
firsts. It was the first
grading service to
encapsulate the coins it
graded into hard plastic
holders, nicknamed
"slabs," and it was the
first grading service to
use 11 levels of Mint
State, from Mint State
60 to MS-70. It rapidly
overtook ANACS, until
then the most active of
grading services in
terms of numbers of
coins graded. PCGS also
published a grading
guide, in 1998, the
first of the private
grading services to do
so.
PCGS was followed by the
Numismatic Guaranty
Corporation of America.
As encapsulated coins
became more popular with
dealers and collectors,
existing services
expanded their services.
INSAB offered a "slab"
service beginning in
1989, as did the ANA
with its ANACS Cache.
In
1990, the American
Numismatic Association
sold ANACS — its grading
and certification
service — to Amos Press
Inc., the owners of Coin
World.
ANA retained the right
to authenticate — but
not grade — coins, and
now operates under the
acronym ANAAB, the
American Numismatic
Association
Authentication Bureau.
Amos Press Inc. retained
the ANACS name, but it
no longer refers to the
American Numismatic
Association. Amos Press
moved ANACS from ANA
headquarters in Colorado
Springs, Colo., to
Columbus, Ohio.
Over the years, other
grading services have
surfaced, some
specializing in paper
money and world coins.
One of the newest opened
in 1998 – the
Independent Coin Grading
Company. Not all of the
companies have
succeeded; several have
closed over the years.
Grading: What's
involved?
Dr. Bagg, in Grading
Coins: A Collection of
Readings that he
co-edited in 1977 with
James J. Jelinski,
described the grade of a
coin as its "level of
preservation." It is not
entirely accurate to
call grading the
charting of wear on a
coin. The very
definition of an
Uncirculated coin (also
called Mint State) is "a
coin which has seen no
circulation" (in
Official American
Numismatic Association
Grading Standards for
United States Coins) and
a coin with "no wear"
(in New Photograde: A
Photographic Grading
Guide for United States
Coins). However,
Uncirculated coins are
subject to other forms
of surface degradation
other than circulation
wear.
A
coin becomes subject to
external factors
affecting its surface
from the second it
leaves the press. The
moment a coin is struck,
it is pushed from the
surface of the anvil
die. The coin then falls
into a bin of other
coins. When the coin
hits the previously
struck coins lying in
the bin, the portion of
its surface coming into
contact with the other
coins will probably be
marred. Then, as the
coins are bundled into
bags or other bins for
shipment to commercial
counting rooms and
banks, the coins will
scrape, scratch and bump
each other.
Contact marks
The collisions between
coins create a variety
of surface marks called
"contact marks" or "bag
marks." A contact mark
may range in severity
from a light, minor
disruption of the coins
surface to a large,
heavy scrape. Generally,
the bigger and heavier
the coin, the larger and
more unsightly the
contact marks, due to
the heavier weight of
the coins.
The location of contact
marks plays a major role
in determining at what
level of Mint State a
coin may be categorized.
For example, marks that
are clearly visible in
the field of a coin, or
on the cheeks, chin or
forehead of a Liberty
Head device are more
distracting than marks
of equal severity hidden
in curls of Liberty's
hair or the wing
feathers of the eagle
found on the reverse of
many U.S. coins.
The size of contact
marks also plays a role
in determining the
proper Mint State level.
Larger marks, of course,
are more distracting
than smaller marks.
Remember, however, that
a contact mark 1
millimeter long is less
distracting on a
large coin such as a
silver dollar (diameter
of 38.1 millimeters)
than it is on a smaller
coin such as a silver
half dime (diameter of
15.5 mm).
The number of contact
marks also plays a
significant role in
determining the proper
level of a Mint State
coin. A coin with
numerous contact marks
is less appealing to the
eye than a coin with one
or two distracting
marks. The diameter of
the coin plays a role
here too. A silver
dollar with five contact
marks scattered across
its surfaces may be
judged appealing; a much
smaller half dime with
five contact marks may
be judged less
appealing, since the
half dime has a smaller
surface area in which
the marks appear.
Luster
Another factor involved
in determining the level
of Mint State and
high-level circulated
grades is luster.
"Luster is simply the
way light reflects from
the microscopic flow
lines of a coin,"
according to ANACS
grader-authenticator
Michael Fahey in "Basic
Grading," a reprint from
his series of articles
in the American
Numismatic Associations
The Numismatist. James
L. Halperin, author of
the Numismatic
Certification Institutes
The NCI Grading Guide,
defines luster as, "The
brightness of a coin
which results from the
way in which it reflects
light."
Luster is imparted to
the surfaces of a coin
at the moment of
striking. The immense
pressures used in the
coining process create
flow lines, the
microscopic lines that
trace the paths the
metal took while filling
the crevices of the die
that compose the
designs.
A
coin with full luster is
generally one that has a
bright, shiny surface
(although toning, to be
discussed later, may
obscure full luster),
caused by the light
reflecting off the
surface of the coin. If
the luster has been
disturbed, the light
reflects from the
surface of the coin
differently; the coin
may appear dull.
Circulation wear erases
the microscopic flow
lines that cause the
luster. Heavy cleaning
or cleaning with a
substance that removes a
microscopic layer of the
surface metal will also
damage the flow lines
and disrupt or eliminate
the luster of a coin.
A
Mint State coin cannot
be lackluster. At best,
an Uncirculated coin
without full luster can
be no higher than Mint
State 63 under the
American Numismatic
Association grading
standards. High-level
circulated coins may
show small patches of
luster in protected
areas.
Wear vs. friction
Once a coin enters the
channels of commerce, it
begins to receive wear.
An individual reaches
into his pocket to pull
out some change and his
fingers rub across the
surfaces of the coin,
creating wear. A coin is
thrown into a cash
register drawer where it
bumps against other
coins, creating more
wear. A dime is used as
an impromptu
screwdriver, damaging
the edge and creating
more wear.
The amount of wear a
coin receives determines
its grade among the
circulated grade levels.
The high points of a
design are usually the
first to depict wear,
since they are the most
exposed. Then the raised
inscriptions and date
depict wear, and
finally, the flat
fields.
Circulation wear erases
design details,
ultimately to the point
where the design
features are only
slightly visible to the
naked eye. The separate
curls of hair tend to
merge, the eagles
feathers are rubbed away
and the inscriptions
begin to disappear into
the fields.
Coins with only the
slightest hint of wear
are called About
Uncirculated, a term
that, if studied
closely, defies logic. A
coin is either
Uncirculated or it is
not. Then, in descending
order, are Extremely
Fine, Very Fine, Fine,
Very Good, Good, About
Good, Fair (and many
years ago, Poor).
Graders use several
levels for some of the
higher circulated grades
to denote, for example,
an Extremely Fine coin
of higher quality than
another legitimate
Extremely Fine coin
(EF-45 vs. EF-40).
Many hobbyists
differentiate between
circulation wear and
another form of wear
labeled "friction."
According to Halperin,
friction is "A
disturbance which
appears either on the
high points of a coin or
in the fields, as a
result of that coin
rubbing against other
projections." It is
often referred to as
cabinet friction, a term
applied to the minute
wear a coin received
when sliding back and
forth in the drawer of a
cabinet used for storage
by earlier numismatists.
According to some
grading services,
friction does disturb
the luster of the coin,
but it should not
disturb the metal
underneath. If it does,
the disturbance falls
into the category of
wear, they believe.
Strike
Strike is "The sharpness
of detail which the coin
had when it was Mint
State," according to
Halperin; Fahey defines
it as "the evenness and
fullness of metal-flow
into all the crevices of
a die."
The amount of pressure
used to strike a coin
controls the sharpness
of a strike. Design
elements may also affect
the
strike; if two large
design features are
centered on both sides
of the same coin, there
may not be enough metal
to flow into every
little crevice of the
design, thus leaving
some details weak and
ill-defined.
A
coin with a sharp strike
has sharp design
details. For example,
the curls of hair on
Libertys head are strong
and distinct. The
feathers on the eagles
wings and breast are
clearly visible. All of
the other design
details, legends and
other elements are sharp
and well defined.
A
coin with a weak strike
has weak and ill-defined
design details. It may
look worn, since design
details are missing from
the high points of a
coin. However, luster is
unimpaired. Lower
striking pressures may
not force the metal into
the deepest crevices on
the die (the highest
point on the coin);
thus, the weaker design
details.
Grading services,
dealers and collectors
consider strike an
important part of a
coins grade. An
Uncirculated coin
relatively free of marks
and with full luster may
still be placed at the
lower end of the Mint
State scale if it has a
weak strike.
Strike affects the value
of a coin. A coin with a
sharp strike will
generally have a higher
value than a coin with a
weak strike, all other
factors being equal.
Toning and color
As a coin ages, the
original color changes
in reaction to the
environment. The
original red of copper
coins becomes brown (or
green). Silver coins may
tone into any color of
the rainbow, depending
on environmental
factors. Gold is a more
stable metal and even
when immersed in
seawater for centuries,
generally shows little
change in tone and
color.
Many years ago, toned
coins, particularly
silver coins, were
judged unattractive.
Silver coins were
"dipped," placed into a
chemical solution that
removed the toning and
restored the shiny
surface by stripping
away the outer surface
of the silver or the
dirt.
However, attractively
toned coins have become
more appreciated from an
aesthetic viewpoint. A
silver dollar with
rainbow toning may bring
a considerable premium
because of its
coloration. Still, coins
that exhibit bright
white, original surfaces
are prized (although
because of the speed
with which silver tones,
some question whether
any coins of a
particular age can
retain their original
surfaces). Coins that
exhibit unattractive
toning (referred to as
tarnish) are considered
to be of lesser quality.
Because attractively
toned coins often bring
higher prices, some
unscrupulous individuals
(called "coin doctors")
have devised ways of
artificially toning
coins. Some use the
bluing materials used by
gunsmiths. Others bake
their coins in ovens
using various substances
to impart different
colors. Some chemically
treat coins.
Novices will find it
difficult to judge
between natural toning
and artificial toning.
Experience is important
here. An individual who
has looked at a large
number of coins will
find that he can
determine at a glance
whether the toning is
natural or whether it
has been artificially
generated. Collectors
should not pay a premium
for an artificially
toned coin.
Other factors
Other factors under some
grading standards do not
affect the grade but may
affect the value. Under
other standards, those
same factors affect both
the grade and the value
of the coin.
Among these factors are
die scratches, not to be
confused with "hairline"
scratches. Die scratches
are thin raised lines on
a coin, resulting from
minute scratches in the
surface of the die. A
hairline is a thin
scratch scraped into the
surface of a coin
inflicted after the coin
is struck.
A
close examination of a
coins surface through a
magnifying glass should
indicate whether a line
on a coin is raised, and
thus a die scratch, or
incused, making it a
hairline scratch.
Hairlines tend to affect
the value more than die
scratches. Most grading
services, however, will
lower the grade of a
coin for more extensive,
distracting die
scratches.
Adjustment marks are
often found on older
U.S. silver and gold
coins. Planchets
(unstruck coins) were
individually weighed
before striking. If
found to be a little
overweight, the excess
gold or silver was filed
away. The striking
pressures often did not
obliterate the
adjustment marks, which
may resemble a series of
parallel grooves.
Adjustment marks may
affect both the grade
and the value.
Eye appeal
All of the factors
mentioned earlier are
ultimately considered
when graders, dealers
and collectors decide on
the "eye appeal" of a
coin. Eye appeal relates
to the overall
attractiveness of a coin
and ultimately
determines its value. A
potential buyer, whether
he is a dealer,
collector or investor,
decides just how
attractive he believes
the coin to be.
Judging eye appeal is a
purely subjective
action. For example, a
coin could have a strong
strike and full details,
possess full luster and
have few large,
distracting contact
marks and still not have
eye appeal if it has
toned to an unattractive
color.
When examining a coin, a
buyer must decide for
himself just how
"pretty" the coin is and
whether its
attractiveness warrants
the price being asked.
Only the buyer can
decide the eye appeal.
Aesthetic judgments
differ from person to
person.
"Raw" coins vs. "slabbed"
coins
When the Professional
Coin Grading Service
began grading coins in
early 1986, it
introduced a new product
onto the market: the "slabbed"
coin. A "slab" is the
hard plastic holder into
which a coin graded by a
third-party grading
service is sealed. The
grading information is
sealed into the slab as
well. The slab permits
both obverse and reverse
of the coin to be
viewed, but generally
not the edge.
Proponents of the "slab"
cite several benefits:
1. A coin encased within
a slab is protected
somewhat from
environmental factors
that could cause a
deterioration in the
coins surfaces, and a
lowering of its grade.
2. By sealing a coin
into the same holder
that contains the
grading certificate, a
buyer is "assured" that
a coin meets the grading
requirements of a
specific grading
service, if graded
accurately. 3. It
permits the "sight
unseen" trading of a
coin (in other words,
various dealers have
agreed to purchase coins
graded by a particular
grading service at the
grade indicated
in the slab, even
without seeing the coin
first).
However, in recent
years, testing has shown
that coins sealed in
grading services slabs
can continue to tone.
That's because the
plastic is permeable;
the chemicals that cause
a coin to tone can
permeate through the
plastic or along the
slabs seals. Collectors
who own slabbed coins
should inspect them
routinely to ensure that
the environment in which
they are stored is not
causing the coins to
tone unattractively.
(Unslabbed coins should
also be examined
regularly for the same
reason.)
Individuals who do not
like slabbed coins cite
detracting factors: 1. A
collector cannot handle
the coin directly. 2.
Slabs do not permit the
edge of the coin to be
viewed. 3. It may be
difficult to form ones
own opinion about a
coins grade if it has
already been
encapsulated, since many
like to grade a coin
without having to
examine it through a
holder.
Another relatively new
term is the "raw" coin.
A "raw" coin is the
nickname used by some
hobbyists for a coin
that has not been graded
and encapsulated by a
third-party grading
service.
Grading guidelines
The following guidelines
are not presented as
grading standards, but
as introductions to the
terminology of grading
and its usage.
A
few words regarding
grading usage. When two
grades are linked
together by a virgule —
as in Mint State 64/65 —
it may mean that the
coin has two grades (the
first grade represents
the obverse and the
second, the reverse) or
that the coin falls into
a range between the two
grades. When two grades
are linked by a hyphen —
as in Mint State 64-65 —
it means that the grade
for both sides lies
somewhere between the
two grades given.
Collectors might want to
exercise caution about
buying a coin graded
AU-BU. Most collectors
believe a coin is either
circulated or
Uncirculated –– it
cannot fall somewhere in
between.
Plus signs are used by
many to indicate a coin
slightly better than the
numerical grade
indicated, but not as
good as the next
numerical grade. A coin
graded MS-60+ is better
than an MS-60 coin, but
not as good as an MS-61
coin. The term "Premium
Quality" means the same
thing as a plus sign:
that a coin is in the
upper range for that
grade and is very close
to the next grade level.
Many dealers and
collectors use
adjectives instead of
numerals, or combine
adjectives and numerals
when speaking about Mint
State coins. A superb or
superb gem coin is
generally MS-67. A gem
coin is usually MS-65.
Some dealers use choice
to describe an MS-63
coin, and others use
choice for an MS-65
coin. Mint State 60
coins are generally
referred to as
Uncirculated or
Brilliant Uncirculated;
sometimes an MS-60 coin
is called typical
Uncirculated. Collectors
should determine what
adjectival "system" the
dealer uses when no
numerals are present
because of the
disagreement over what
the adjectives represent
numerically.
Buyers should remember
that different dealers,
different collectors and
investors use different
grading systems.
Although various grading
services use an 11-point
Mint State system, this
does not necessarily
mean they use the same
criteria for assigning
grades. In fact, there
is no universally
accepted standard for
determining grades for
U.S. coins.
Hobbyists can have
legitimate differences
of opinion over a coins
grade.
Grading is
subjective, not
objective.
Collectors should also
know that grading
standards can change
over time. Standards
sometimes tighten up,
with a coin once
considered Mint State 65
now considered MS-64.
Standards can also
loosen, with an MS-64
coin grading MS-65 under
the looser standards.
This can be troublesome,
especially if a novice
collector buys a slabbed
coin graded during a
period of loose
standards; even if the
slab is marked as MS-65,
current standards might
consider the coin no
higher than MS-64.
That's why it is vital
that collectors learn
how to grade coins, in
order to protect
themselves when buying
coins.
Read about, and view
examples of various
grades
Proof: Traditionally,
Proof describes a method
of manufacture, not a
grade. However, since
numerals are often
assigned to Proof coins,
there are different
qualities of Proof
coins; in effect,
different grades. A
circulated Proof is
often called an
"impaired Proof." When
abbreviated, Proof
generally appears as PF.
Brilliant Proof coins
are struck on highly
polished planchets,
using slower,
high-pressure presses;
coins are struck two or
more times to bring up
greater detail in the
design.
Mint State and
Uncirculated: The two
terms are
interchangeable and
describe a coin that has
no wear. To qualify as
Mint State, a coin must
not have any level of
wear. Even the slightest
amount of wear will drop
the coin into the About
Uncirculated level.
(Coins described by some
dealers as "Borderline
Uncirculated" have wear
and are actually About
Uncirculated. New
collectors should be
aware of this fact and
not pay a Brilliant )
Mint State is most often
used with numerals. Mint
State is abbreviated as
MS.
The numerical Mint State
system so widely used in
the current rare coin
market is based on a
system created by Dr.
William H. Sheldon for
the U.S. large cents of
1793 to 1814. When the
numerical system began
to spread to other
series, three levels of
Mint State were used:
Mint State 60, for an
Uncirculated coin of
average luster, strike
and marks; MS-65, an
Uncirculated coin of
above average quality;
and MS-70, a perfect
coin as regards luster,
strike and marks. All 11
numbers are now used
from MS-60 to MS-70.
Uncirculated is usually
abbreviated as Unc. It
often appears as
Brilliant Uncirculated,
abbreviated as BU.
Sometimes used with
numerals, generally as
Unc. 60, and so on. Some
dealers use a plus sign
to indicate a coin
better than one level of
Mint State, but not as
good as the next level.
About Uncirculated: This
is a coin with only the
barest traces of wear on
the highest points of
the design. It is
abbreviated AU and often
appears with numerals as
AU-50, AU-55 and AU-58.
The term has gained
acceptance despite
seeming inconsistency.
Some people in the hobby
still say that no coin
can be About
Uncirculated — it is
either Uncirculated or
it is not. Some use
Almost Uncirculated,
although all major U.S.
grading guides use
"About." The AU-58 grade
has been described as an
MS-63 coin with just the
slightest hint of wear.
It should have fewer
contact marks than lower
level Mint State coins:
MS-60, MS-61 and MS-62.
It may be more
attractive and more
valuable than these
lower Mint State coins.
Extremely Fine: Light
overall wear on highest
points, but with all
design elements sharp
and clear, distinguishes
this grade. Most
hobbyists abbreviate it
as EF, although a few
use XF. It appears as
EF-40 and EF-45.
Very Fine: The coin has
light to moderate even
wear on surface and high
points of design.
Abbreviated VF, it
appears with numerals as
VF-20 and VF-30. The
abbreviations VF-25 and
VF-35 are infrequently
used.
Fine: The wear is
considerable although
the entire design is
still strong and
visible. It is
abbreviated as F-12.
Very Good: The design
and surface are well
worn, and main features
are clear but flat.
Abbreviated as VG, it is
used with numerals as
VG-8 and VG-10.
Good: Design and surface
are heavily worn, with
some details weak and
many details flat. It is
abbreviated only when
used with numerals, G-4;
G-6 is infrequently
used. Ironically, a coin
in Good condition is not
a "good" coin to
collect; a Good coin is
generally the lowest
collectible grade.
About Good: The design
is heavily worn with
surface wear
Net Grading
Net grading is a term
used when referring to
coins that have
problems. For example, a
coin might have XF wear,
but have been scratched,
corroded, cleaned, etc.
Often, such a coin will
be given a "net" grade,
say VF reflecting the
undesirable issues. This
is meant to reflect that
while the coin may
technically grade XF,
the market value should
be somewhere close to
that of an average VF
coin. While completely
problem free coins are
the exception, net
grading is probably
applied to less than a
fourth of the coins.
|
Grading
Levels
|
|
MS |
60-70
|
Uncirculated
|
|
AU |
50, 53,
55, 58
|
About
Uncirculated
|
|
XF |
40, 45
|
Extremely
Fine
|
|
VF |
20, 25,
30, 35
|
Very
Fine
|
|
F |
12, 15
|
Fine
|
|
VG |
8, 10
|
Very
Good
|
|
G |
4, 6
|
Good
|
|
AG |
3 |
About
Good
|
|
FR |
2 |
Fair
|
|
PR |
1 |
Poor
|
|
|
|
|
|